May 10, 2007

May 10, 2007
Thursday May 10th unbelievable michael.
Filed under: Uncategorized — Jimmy Hostility @ 12:43 am
What a bunch of Rubish!!!

17 Comments »
I posted this last night on wednesday’s blog, but I wanted to make sure Michael saw it so I am posting it on thursday’s also.

Michael you are amazing!!! The truth comes out. You arn’t atheist. You arn’t inactive in the mormon church because of all the rubbish you have told us. You were dumb enough to keep reading all the anti mormon crap you could find untill eventually you believed it. Unbelievable. You are a real piece of work. You should atleast have the integrity to be honest with your friends. Obviously I can understand how you would be ashamed of that being the reason. I mean really all the anti crap is so silly. I mean it takes a real smuck to fall for it. The documents probably were to be hidden away so that ignorant don’t get confused and fall away. But like Jon said the church or us arn’t hiding anything. the church has a huge(bigger than you can imagine) collection of papers, articles, books ect…. The church has not only true reigious books, but also false doctrine books. Man I have thought once or twice before that you had probably gotten to the point where you are at by letting a coupld of jehovah’s witnesses in who fed you full of a bunch of anti mormon crap, But I gave you the benifit of the doubt on it. You have created such an elaborate story as to your reasons. When in reality its all a lie. I am such a fool for not figuring this out earlier. That anti stuff is so silly. But I know that once you let satan in and you start looking at it you can be led astray. If it didn’t work Satan wouldn’t use it. Well I guess you have probably gotten lots of enjoyment out of us on this one. you’ve gotten us to spend hours trying to help you with lie’s. Wasting our time talking about things that aren’t even issues for you. All because you were too embarrased to tell us you were fooled by a couple of JW’s. So you know, if you brought up this topic hoping to instigate many more conversations about your true reasons for ditching the LDS church I am not interested. Talking about Anti Mormon stuff is a complete waste of time. You will never be able to find the truth until you forget about that crap and start seaking the truth again. Obviously you arn’t going to convince any of us to believe any of that ignorant rubish. And I know from lots of experience that we can’t convince someone who is as far down that path as you must be. So don’t come on here trying to mention any of that crap. I won’t have it. When you decide you are ready to actually start seaking the truth again let me know, and we can discuss it.

spencer

Comment by Frodo Baggins — May 10, 2007 @ 12:44 am

sorry I haven’t been blogging much lately. I am going to have to do early mornings and late at night and weekends for the next while.

Comment by Frodo Baggins — May 10, 2007 @ 12:48 am

Man, if that doesn’t stir the pot, i don’t know what will, i feel a rumble coming! LOL

Comment by jtuffy — May 10, 2007 @ 7:47 am

All right, Romney fired back.
Cnn
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/05/09/sharpton.romney/index.html

Fox version
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,271162,00.html

Comment by jtuffy — May 10, 2007 @ 7:58 am

After a long absence… i return.

I appreciate your comments jenny. Michael, it is definitely below you to refer to someone we respect as a prophet as the “profit.” it is a tactic used by people that i have read that are against the church and it is a cheap attack. so, because you didn’t come up with it yourself and because you don’t say why you are calling him that, it is below your intellect and if you were really going to make an attack on the prophet i would expect something more put together.

the prophet is someone we love and respect and if you love and respect us, you could at least refrain from disrespecting him. not that we have always done a good job of respecting what you present to us, but maybe this is a lesson for all of us.

as well, if you are really interested in this document thing, why not ask instead of accusing. what kind of response did you expect? when did this blog become a battle ground?

side note, i don’t think i know leigh ann. introductions? leigh ann, it’s nice to meet you. i ran around with these kids in high school.

slaughter house five. i’ve got it. i’m half way through. we need to make our own page or something so that a cohesive discussion can ensue. or maybe a conference call. for now - i notice a constant theme of futility. in almost everything he states, in symbolism, in tone, in syntax. futility. thoughts?

alright, gotta run.

Comment by The Scam — May 10, 2007 @ 9:44 am

Nice to meet you too!

Comment by Leigh Ann — May 10, 2007 @ 9:51 am

Ok, Scam… there is a SH-5 page. Just check the archive and start posting.

Comment by Seth — May 10, 2007 @ 10:38 am

ok, seth, hope you don’t take offense but i deleted you previous start of the sh5 and posted a new one and created a category called book club, so now, when the daily pages take over you can just click on the book club category at the right and be able to find it quickly. All righty, lets get to posting about the book.

Comment by jtuffy — May 10, 2007 @ 10:53 am

As far as all of yesterday’s buisness… if by fetal position you mean finding other things to do because that conversation was a waist of time, yes I guess I was in the fetal position.

The Scam brings up a good point. If you want to know, ask. I actualy have a decent bit of information about the documents. My Dad was a “history buff” and always paid close attention to church history and current findings related too it. I remember when all of this went down. I even remember watching the 60 minutes special about the salamander letters, and the other shows that came out at the time. I remember the statements from the church and statements regarding the church… so if you want to know, ask. And it would do you some good, because there is alot more too it than what you think.

I am going to post about the article you sent on your page because I don’t think everyone really wants to read it.

Comment by Seth — May 10, 2007 @ 10:59 am

That’s a better idea than mine Jony… great thinking.

Comment by Seth — May 10, 2007 @ 11:00 am

not much action today huh?

Comment by jtuffy — May 10, 2007 @ 2:56 pm

Where’s Michael?

Comment by Leigh Ann — May 10, 2007 @ 3:29 pm

Apparently I posted on the “book club” page. I like the name of this page much better anyway! Here’s a copy of my post:

Goodness Gracious people! Let’s start with Scam since his post really stood out in a couple of places: First of all, you are exactly what you accused me of, do you realize that? You condemned me for something I did on ACCIDENT and you even had the writing right there in front of you to know that. I even apologized for it. This refers to my accidental mispelling of “prophet”. Total accident. Call me stupid for not catching that myself, but don’t call me less of a person for throwing cheap-shots. Didn’t do it. Plus - and Spence may be surprised to hear this - I’ve never read any anti-mormon literature, and I’ve especially never read any anti-mormon literature that used “profit” for “prophet”. It NEVER crossed my mind.

Another BIG point to make: I think Scam also used ANOTHER thing against me that I’ve already set straight. About the article I sent you guys for YOUR OWN benefit, I THINK Scam was referring to me as not simply “asking” about it. But in reality, I did ask Seth about it. Also, I didn’t expect you, Scam, to read it until you were done with your finals. However, I didn’t EXPECT ANYONE to read it at all; I just expected you guys to let me know if you would or wouldn’t since you guys told me you were interested. I took the time to think about you guys, obtain an article I could send, and send it to you guys. I cared about your health enough to do this. I hoped you guys would find it useful. You didn’t, so be it. But I DID ask Seth, and when he still hadn’t read it, but expressed he still wanted to, I ASKED him to just let me know what he thinks when he gets the chance. He agreed. I guess you guys think I should just keep asking. Scam, I was going to ASK you after your finals.

Anyway, more to come, you can count on that! I still have a couple of names on my list…

Comment by Michael — May 10, 2007 @ 6:28 pm

There you go!

Comment by jtuffy — May 10, 2007 @ 6:54 pm

Michael… just wondering if you even read my post on your page.

Comment by Seth — May 10, 2007 @ 7:21 pm

Seth, I haven’t had any time up to this point, but I will DEFINITELY look at it later tonight. Thanks for that.

Comment by Michael — May 10, 2007 @ 10:09 pm

You guys (tuffy, spence) have dropped the ball. Where’s today’s page?

Seth, thanks for the thorough feedback. I actually thought you posted an article from Ensign on my page. Anyway, please check out my response.

Comment by Michael — May 11, 2007 @ 11:09 am